Page 12 - Microsoft Word - EAIE_Anniversary_book_Final.docx
P. 12

   



               	   

               Priority	   2:	   Preparing	   students	   to	   be	   members	   of	   an	   interconnected	   world	   community	   

               Internationalisation of the curriculum is concerned with preparation for life as a citizen as well

               as life as a professional. It should not just be about training for the performance demands of
               professional practice in a globalised world (Mestenhauser 1998; Barnett 2000; Rizvi and

               Lingard 2010). It should also prepare students to be ethical and responsible citizens; human
               and social beings in this globalised world. A number of scholars call for such an approach
               with urgency. Bennett (2003) argues that the development of global souls who “see

               themselves as members of a world community, knowing that they share the future with
               others” should be at the heart of education (p. 13).  Nussbaum (2010) argues that the
               recognition of fellow citizens as having equal rights regardless of difference in race, gender,

               religion, sexuality, concern for the lives of others and the ability to imagine well and see
               one’s own nation and life as part of a complicated world order are important skills in a
               globalised world. Rizvi and Lingard (2010) urge us to move away from the dominant

               neoliberal imaginary towards a new and blended imaginary which “recognizes that students
               are social and cultural beings as well as economic ones” and the need to develop their ability

               to think locally, nationally and globally (p.201). This curriculum would “seek to work with a
               different moral sense of people’s situatedness in the world’” (Rizvi and Lingard, 2010,
               p.201).


               However, when a programme is accredited by a local external professional body the

               requirements of professional practice frequently dominate the curriculum. Academic staff will
               frequently argue that the curriculum is too full to do anything other than fulfil the
               requirements of the accreditation bodies upon which they depend for academic survival. In

               this situation developing students’ capacities to meet the moral responsibilities of an
               increasingly connected world, in which the benefits of globalisation are not equally shared,
               may be disregarded.


               It is important to achieve the right balance in the higher education curriculum between the
               local and the global; between training students to work locally in a globalised world and

               educating them as ethical and responsible human beings and social actors in this world. This
               is an important priority for the future.


               Priority	   3:	   	   Assessing	   the	   development	   of	   intercultural	   competence	   






                                                                                                       12	   
               	   
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17