Page 6 - Microsoft Word - VN INTL-CURRICULUM.docx
P. 6

6                ¡Error! Marcador no definido.Author name / Procedia Computer Science 00 (2019) 000–000
             44.  Contents. The content or learning experience fosters non-Western knowledge, knowledge of other cultures,
                the  practice  of  discipline  in  other  contexts  and  interculturality  in  professional  practice,  the  use  of
                bibliography in other languages [10].
             45.  Personal learning networks. Students build their own interactive, diverse, autonomous and open learning
                networks;  the  student  learns  collaboratively  with  a  commitment  to  mutual  learning,  acceptance  of  the
                diversity  of  personalities  /  postures  /  ways  of  seeing  life,  of  shared  responsibility;  the  student  does  not
                depend on limits set by fixed agendas or calendars or by physical space.
             46.  Student teacher relations. The joint construction of knowledge and the relationship of faculty and students
                focuses on the latter's learning. The faculty as facilitator and guide adopts new roles, teaching methods;
                encourages students to explore how knowledge is a cultural construction and that changes according to
                other  cultures;  The  faculty  encourages  global  literacy  or  the  interrelation  of  concepts  and  phenomena
                worldwide. The student is autonomous and responsible for their learning process, acts to respond to their
                personal needs, sets the pace of their own learning, organizes their time by dedicating a part of it to their
                training.
             47.  Learning outcomes. Learning outcomes prepare the student for situations encountered in other settings, to
                understand  the  connections  between  the  local  and  the  global,  the  “world-mindedness”,  respect  and
                understanding of diverse cultures, the critical evaluation of their own assumptions regarding other cultures
                and  ways  of  life,  awareness  about  the  state  of  the  planet  and  global  dynamics.  The  internationalized
                learning outcomes are the knowledge, skills and values with international and global relevance, acquired by
                the students as a result of the educational experience when studying a course or project for their training as
                a global professional [1].
             48.  Bibliography. Bibliography is used to supports the teaching-learning process in other languages, includes
                non-Western paradigms of the discipline, is updated with the latest knowledge trends.
             49.  Classroom  practices.  The  faculty  lectures  in  another  language;  contextualize  knowledge;  proposes  the
                realization or use of comparative, interdisciplinary, international studies; encourages collaborative learning;
                promotes the ability to navigate, critically use information and build connective learning with networks of
                students from other universities abroad; use simulations or role play of applying their knowledge in diverse
                cultures; applies pedagogical strategies to integrate heterogeneous groups of students taking into account
                intercultural aspects, age, place of origin, learning styles; promotes the development of classroom projects
                with professors from foreign universities; promotes the bonding of foreign students.
             50.  Evaluation. The faculty applies diverse methods for the evaluation of students before, during and at the end
                of the learning process respecting individual differences and attending to the individual educational needs
                of any nature (portfolios, works, exhibitions, interviews, simulations, dramatizations, case reports, projects,
                problem situation, demonstrations); It uses simultaneous evaluation procedures (self-assessment, student
                assessment, assessment of other teachers to the student).

         3. Behavior Pattern

            The  methodology  that  is  proposed  once  the  criteria  have  been  listed,  is  to  prepare  a  diagnosis  of  the  level  of
         development of each of them, using a Likert value scale as shown in the following example, for the institutional
         structure dimension:






                       CRITERIA DEVELOPMENT LEVEL       5      4     3      2     1
                         1.     Culture                                           x
                         2.     Normative               x
                         3.     Educational model              x
                         4.     Strategic plan                              x
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9