Page 7 - Microsoft Word - VN INTL-CURRICULUM.docx

¡Error! Marcador no definido.Author name / Procedia Computer Science 00 (2019) 000–000 7

5. Internationalization policy x
6. Curriculum policy x
7. Teaching regulations x
8. Student regulations x
9. Foreign language policy x
10. Virtuality policy x
11. Mobility Policy x
12. Internationalization networks policy x
13. Teacher management x
14. Knowledge management policy x
15. Accreditation guidelines x

Table 1- Rating Scale for the diagnosis of the state of internationalization of the curriculum

The rating scale consists of a series of categories before each of which the observer must issue a judgment,
indicating the degree to which the criterion is met, based on evidence collected. A simple scale is the following, in
which ranges can be generated: i) 5 the criterion is fully met, ii) 4 the criterion has a satisfactory performance, iii) 3
the criterion is met fairly, iv) the criterion is met poorly, v) the criterion is not met.

Each criterion must be assessed with this or another scale, and once the identification of the level of development
suggested by the institution, program and/or learning environment, the information is taken to a graph. In these
graphs it is possible to visualize if a criterion is developed when it moves away from the center of the graph and
needs a boost when the criterion is very close to the nucleus, as shown in the following graphs, called cartographies,
which can be designed in different ways:

1. Culture
5
15. Accreditation guidelines 2. Normative
4,5
4
14. Knowledge management 3,5 3. Educational model
policy
3
2,5
2
13. Teacher management 1,5 4. Strategic plan
1
0,5
0
12. Internationalization 5. Internacionalization
networks policy policy
11. Mobility Policy 6. Curriculum policy
10. Virtuality policy 7. Teaching regulations
9. Foreign language policy 8. Student regulations

Figure 1- Cartography of the structure of the internationalization of the curriculum: institutional dimension